Modern Views: A Battle with the Boys

Today I have a bit of a hot-topic for you. Actually, probably the hottest topic in current American culture: Gender roles and women in the workplace. Don’t bring it up at a Christmas party, you’re sure to get icy stares, a few less friends, an angry defense, or a long, long, longggg uncomfortable silence. 

mad men

If you didn’t read / hear about Suzanne Venker‘s article “The War on Men” published Monday on foxnews.com, you’re missing quite the debate. VMMV is not a blog for soapbox posts but this article, and Suzanne herself, has so much to say about topics similar to why I even began this blog that I thought it would be appropriate to share. If you feel like joining the debate, check out the comments about her article on this Facebook page. I’ll warn you though, it’s pretty heated!

If you haven’t read it, the article starts with a new study showing that while the percentage of women who believe a successful marriage is one of the most important things in life has gone up since similar polls in 1997, the percentage of men who believe this has actually gone down. Why? Well, Venker suggests that this is because men are sick and tired of the fact that “women aren’t women anymore.” She suggests that the feminist agenda pushes women to believe men are the competition, or, the enemy. The drive to achieve equality (or, often, superiority) in work-place respect, wage-earnings, and corporate positions has made women either angry or defensive and created a modern woman who won’t let a man do what is in his DNA to do: “Men want to love women, not compete with them. They want to provide for and protect their families.” And men, as the poll and Venger suggest, are beginning to give up hoping to do that. She says that if women are angry at the state of the modern man: retreating from marriage, slacking responsibility, and being immature and dependent, it’s actually the woman’s fault. In her words, the “rise of women has not threatened men. It has pissed them off.”

mid-century modern officeAs you can imagine, the responses to Venker’s article were charged with some serious emotion. Many women took her suggestions to the extreme and protested that women have worked hard to move beyond their “role” as a June Cleaver, pushing vacuums in pearls and greeting her sons at the kitchen door with home-baked goods. They were horrified that any inhibitions of the modern male could possibly be blamed upon women who were finally being given opportunities they deserved.

june cleaverWhat I believe Venker was suggesting though was not that women shouldn’t pursue high-education or lofty personal ambitions and career goals, but that they need to give up on the lie that women can have it all, and do it all well. Whether you want to admit it or not, Venker says that “women are forever seeking a balanced life.” That is, a balance between the modern options of pursuing pretty much any career you desire, or nurturing the natural feminine desires to have a family. If a woman wants a man who acts like a man, that is independent, responsible, self-sufficient and capable of caring for a family, then she must be a women: someone who is nurturing, selfless, capable of loving and of being loved. Women will protest, why aren’t men expected to be at home with the kids? Why must the woman give up her personal goals for someone else? Why indeed? Because women and men are different. However much modernity is pushing for equality, women and men were made for different purposes. Of course women should have equal opportunities, equal wages, equal rights for those to take who want them. But, be careful what you wish for. If you’re prepping for an ambitious career, don’t be too angry when someone doesn’t hold the door for you. Or, if you’re choosing to share a life with a man and hoping to create a home, just know the men are a little gun-shy.

vintage woman in the workplace

If you’re a woman who’s disgusted at the modern gender confusion though, Venker  offers some hope. She suggests that “women have the power to turn everything around. All they have to do is surrender to their nature–their femininity–and men will surrender to theirs.”

So, what do you think? What’s your take on the modern views on gender roles? I’d love to hear everyone’s thoughts. Comment on the post or send me an email (aaelightsey@gmail.com) if you’re feeling like this topic is a little bit too hot for public view of your opinions.

– <3 A.

6 thoughts on “Modern Views: A Battle with the Boys

    • Thanks for commenting Gene! glad you enjoyed the article. The video was interesting. His comment at the end though, that girls and boys should be encouraged to go into fields that historically they haven’t is a valid one but it seems to me that, usually, people choose to do what they’re best at. If a boy is good at math and so chooses Engineering, and a girl is interested in helping people by going into nursing, I don’t think that’s gender discrimination, I think that’s using one’s skills wisely!

  1. Very well argued. While I fully acknowledge the natural differences between men and women, I feel that the ever-prevalent issue of appropriate gender roles focuses less on the definitions of our “natural” roles, and more about how we choose to fulfill them. Women have infinitely more opportunities in the workspace, military, government, etc. than half a century ago. I see this change to be reflective of individual women’s choices in how they want to pave their future, not that they have gone against nature. So when Venker advises women to “surrender to their nature – their femininity,” I would rather CHOOSE to be the nurturer, instead of surrendering and giving up my opportunities as a working woman. It’s a subtle difference, but it makes an enormous difference to me.

  2. Pingback: Confusing a Generation of “Gentlemen” « vintage muse modern views

  3. Pingback: Origins of the Ideal « vintage muse modern views

Leave a Reply